https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448964 The HC dismissed the appeal, affirming the ITAT's decision that the error in the tax return was not due to intentional concealment of income. The court agreed with the ITAT's factual findings, which indicated that the error was a result of the CFO's inadvertent mistake during electronic filing, not a deliberate attempt to furnish inaccurate particulars. The decision was supported by the tax audit report filed with the return, and the court referenced the Price Waterhouse Coopers Pvt Ltd. case to emphasize the unintentional nature of the error. en-us Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Feb 2026 17:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448964 The HC dismissed the appeal, affirming the ITAT's decision that the error in the tax return was not due to intentional concealment of income. The court agreed with the ITAT's factual findings, which indicated that the error was a result of the CFO's inadvertent mistake during electronic filing, not a deliberate attempt to furnish inaccurate particulars. The decision was supported by the tax audit report filed with the return, and the court referenced the Price Waterhouse Coopers Pvt Ltd. case to emphasize the unintentional nature of the error. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448964