<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules Business Income Reporting Accurate; AO and CIT(A) Wrong on Unaccounted Income Additions u/s 68.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74587</link>
    <description>Additions u/s 68 - Unaccounted business income - The tribunal held that, the assessee has rightly claimed the said trading as business income - The sale proceeds of shares were properly explained by the assessee through the documentary evidence which was filed before the AO as well as before the CIT(A). AO as well as the CIT(A) was not right in making/confirming the addition to that effect. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 07:51:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 07:51:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules Business Income Reporting Accurate; AO and CIT(A) Wrong on Unaccounted Income Additions u/s 68.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74587</link>
      <description>Additions u/s 68 - Unaccounted business income - The tribunal held that, the assessee has rightly claimed the said trading as business income - The sale proceeds of shares were properly explained by the assessee through the documentary evidence which was filed before the AO as well as before the CIT(A). AO as well as the CIT(A) was not right in making/confirming the addition to that effect. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 07:51:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>