<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 100 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448949</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court treated the CESTAT&#039;s conclusions as findings of fact and held that they did not give rise to any substantial question of law. As no legal issue warranting appellate interference arose from those factual determinations, the Court declined to exercise its appellate jurisdiction. The appeals were therefore dismissed, and the pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 100 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448949</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court treated the CESTAT&#039;s conclusions as findings of fact and held that they did not give rise to any substantial question of law. As no legal issue warranting appellate interference arose from those factual determinations, the Court declined to exercise its appellate jurisdiction. The appeals were therefore dismissed, and the pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>