<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 91 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448940</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging resolution plan approval. Appellant contested non-allocation of marks for equity allotment to financial creditors and alleged mis-calculation of successful bidder&#039;s NPV. NCLAT held appellant&#039;s equity offer of Rs.200 crores failed to meet minimum Rs.250 crores threshold per evaluation matrix, and CoC never accepted equity allotment option. Regarding NPV calculation, tribunal ruled CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in evaluating resolution plans is paramount and cannot be challenged by other applicants absent Section 30(2) violations. Adjudicating Authority&#039;s approval of resolution plan upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 91 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448940</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging resolution plan approval. Appellant contested non-allocation of marks for equity allotment to financial creditors and alleged mis-calculation of successful bidder&#039;s NPV. NCLAT held appellant&#039;s equity offer of Rs.200 crores failed to meet minimum Rs.250 crores threshold per evaluation matrix, and CoC never accepted equity allotment option. Regarding NPV calculation, tribunal ruled CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in evaluating resolution plans is paramount and cannot be challenged by other applicants absent Section 30(2) violations. Adjudicating Authority&#039;s approval of resolution plan upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>