https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448926 The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, determining that the show cause notice issued by the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise was invalid due to the finality of previous decisions by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Revisionary Authority, which had allowed the rebate claims. The court found the notice to be infructuous and granted the reliefs requested by the petitioner under Article 226, dismissing the notice without costs. en-us Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Feb 2024 07:49:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448926 The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, determining that the show cause notice issued by the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise was invalid due to the finality of previous decisions by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Revisionary Authority, which had allowed the rebate claims. The court found the notice to be infructuous and granted the reliefs requested by the petitioner under Article 226, dismissing the notice without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448926