https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312122 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 was examined in light of the doctrine of forum conveniens. The Court found that the grievance arose mainly from events in Uttar Pradesh, where the appellant resided and the examinations were to be conducted, so the mere presence of the respondent in Delhi and reliance on affiliation bye-laws did not by themselves make Delhi the proper forum. It held that a small or incidental part of the cause of action does not automatically confer jurisdiction, and a jurisdiction clause cannot override the forum conveniens inquiry where no direct impugned action in Delhi is shown. The writ appeal was therefore not entertained in Delhi. en-us Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Feb 2024 18:25:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312122 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 was examined in light of the doctrine of forum conveniens. The Court found that the grievance arose mainly from events in Uttar Pradesh, where the appellant resided and the examinations were to be conducted, so the mere presence of the respondent in Delhi and reliance on affiliation bye-laws did not by themselves make Delhi the proper forum. It held that a small or incidental part of the cause of action does not automatically confer jurisdiction, and a jurisdiction clause cannot override the forum conveniens inquiry where no direct impugned action in Delhi is shown. The writ appeal was therefore not entertained in Delhi. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312122