<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 2052 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312112</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the extension of the retirement age for AYUSH medical practitioners from 62 to 65 years. The decision aligned with a previous Central Administrative Tribunal ruling and a Co-ordinate Bench judgment, both of which upheld the retirement age extension to match that of allopathic doctors. The court found no new grounds to deviate from these precedents and affirmed the extension, granting relief to AYUSH practitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 2052 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312112</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the extension of the retirement age for AYUSH medical practitioners from 62 to 65 years. The decision aligned with a previous Central Administrative Tribunal ruling and a Co-ordinate Bench judgment, both of which upheld the retirement age extension to match that of allopathic doctors. The court found no new grounds to deviate from these precedents and affirmed the extension, granting relief to AYUSH practitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>