https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312111 The HC dismissed the writ petition by the Union of India challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's order, which enhanced the retirement age of a dental surgeon from 60 to 65 years, aligning it with the retirement age of Allopathic doctors. The HC upheld the Tribunal's decision, noting the Government's subsequent decision to raise the retirement age for dental doctors to 65 years. The HC directed the payment of arrears and future salary to the respondent, ensuring no administrative duties were assigned, thus maintaining equitable treatment under Article 226 of the Constitution. en-us Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Feb 2024 18:24:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312111 The HC dismissed the writ petition by the Union of India challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's order, which enhanced the retirement age of a dental surgeon from 60 to 65 years, aligning it with the retirement age of Allopathic doctors. The HC upheld the Tribunal's decision, noting the Government's subsequent decision to raise the retirement age for dental doctors to 65 years. The HC directed the payment of arrears and future salary to the respondent, ensuring no administrative duties were assigned, thus maintaining equitable treatment under Article 226 of the Constitution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312111