<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 25 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35660</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding deductions and expenses in the case. It upheld the deductibility of compensation for short packing of controlled cloth and contribution for higher medium cloth production under the Cotton Textiles (Control) Order, 1948. The Court also ruled that the payment for shortfall in export performance was a legitimate business expense, not a penalty. Additionally, it allowed the entertainment expenses disallowed by the ITO, stating they were incurred in the ordinary course of business. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the legitimacy of the deductions and expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:54:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 25 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35660</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding deductions and expenses in the case. It upheld the deductibility of compensation for short packing of controlled cloth and contribution for higher medium cloth production under the Cotton Textiles (Control) Order, 1948. The Court also ruled that the payment for shortfall in export performance was a legitimate business expense, not a penalty. Additionally, it allowed the entertainment expenses disallowed by the ITO, stating they were incurred in the ordinary course of business. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the legitimacy of the deductions and expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>