<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Holding Company&#039;s Share Ownership Not a &quot;Supply of Service&quot; Under GST, Court Rules Order Illegal and Arbitrary.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74570</link>
    <description>Supply of Services - activity of holding of shares of subsidiary company by holding company - During the proceedings, the Central and State Governments issued clarifications stating that merely holding shares in a subsidiary company by a holding company should not be treated as a &quot;supply of service&quot; under GST. Based on these clarifications, the petitioner&#039;s counsel submitted that the activity of holding shares in a subsidiary by a holding company cannot be construed as &quot;supply of service&quot; as per GST law. - Accordingly, the High court held that the impugned order was illegal and arbitrary, as it wrongly classified holding shares in a subsidiary as &quot;supply of service&quot;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 07:45:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 07:45:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Holding Company&#039;s Share Ownership Not a &quot;Supply of Service&quot; Under GST, Court Rules Order Illegal and Arbitrary.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74570</link>
      <description>Supply of Services - activity of holding of shares of subsidiary company by holding company - During the proceedings, the Central and State Governments issued clarifications stating that merely holding shares in a subsidiary company by a holding company should not be treated as a &quot;supply of service&quot; under GST. Based on these clarifications, the petitioner&#039;s counsel submitted that the activity of holding shares in a subsidiary by a holding company cannot be construed as &quot;supply of service&quot; as per GST law. - Accordingly, the High court held that the impugned order was illegal and arbitrary, as it wrongly classified holding shares in a subsidiary as &quot;supply of service&quot;.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 07:45:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>