<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 58 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448907</link>
    <description>HC ruled on a tax dispute involving retrospective amendments to Section 50 of the Central GST Act. The court directed tax authorities to recalculate the interest demand based on amended provisions. The petitioner was allowed to submit a representation for redetermination of the tax liability, with payment required to lift bank account attachment, while preserving authorities&#039; right to enforce any remaining balance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 58 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448907</link>
      <description>HC ruled on a tax dispute involving retrospective amendments to Section 50 of the Central GST Act. The court directed tax authorities to recalculate the interest demand based on amended provisions. The petitioner was allowed to submit a representation for redetermination of the tax liability, with payment required to lift bank account attachment, while preserving authorities&#039; right to enforce any remaining balance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>