<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 37 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448886</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that assessment orders without Document Identification Number (DIN) mentioned on the body are invalid and deemed never issued, as per CBDT Circular dated 14/08/2019. The tribunal ruled that Board circulars are binding on revenue authorities without exception, and non-compliance with DIN requirements is not merely a procedural violation but vitiates the entire communication. The subsequent generation of DIN in ITBA system cannot cure this defect as it is only a post-assessment action. The assessment order becomes voidable at the assessee&#039;s instance regardless of proving prejudice. Decision favored the assessee against revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 07:44:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 37 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448886</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that assessment orders without Document Identification Number (DIN) mentioned on the body are invalid and deemed never issued, as per CBDT Circular dated 14/08/2019. The tribunal ruled that Board circulars are binding on revenue authorities without exception, and non-compliance with DIN requirements is not merely a procedural violation but vitiates the entire communication. The subsequent generation of DIN in ITBA system cannot cure this defect as it is only a post-assessment action. The assessment order becomes voidable at the assessee&#039;s instance regardless of proving prejudice. Decision favored the assessee against revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>