https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74533 Dishonour of Cheque - Supreme Court held that, the presumptions under the NI Act albeit rebuttable operate in favour of the complainant. Hence, it is for the accused to rebut such presumptions by leading appropriate defence evidence and the Court cannot be expected to assist the accused to collect evidence on his behalf. - Further, there was no requirement for the appellate Court to have exercised power under Section 391 CrPC for summoning the official from the Post Office and had rightly rejected the application under Section 391 CrPC. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 2024 07:43:34 +0530 Thu, 01 Feb 2024 07:43:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74533 Dishonour of Cheque - Supreme Court held that, the presumptions under the NI Act albeit rebuttable operate in favour of the complainant. Hence, it is for the accused to rebut such presumptions by leading appropriate defence evidence and the Court cannot be expected to assist the accused to collect evidence on his behalf. - Further, there was no requirement for the appellate Court to have exercised power under Section 391 CrPC for summoning the official from the Post Office and had rightly rejected the application under Section 391 CrPC. Highlights Indian Laws Thu, 01 Feb 2024 07:43:34 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74533