<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 2 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448851</link>
    <description>The court quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as she did not issue the cheque in question. The proceedings were initiated against both the petitioner and her husband, but the court determined that the offence under Section 138 can only be pursued against the individual who issued the cheque. Consequently, the case against the petitioner was deemed unsustainable and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 07:43:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 2 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448851</link>
      <description>The court quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as she did not issue the cheque in question. The proceedings were initiated against both the petitioner and her husband, but the court determined that the offence under Section 138 can only be pursued against the individual who issued the cheque. Consequently, the case against the petitioner was deemed unsustainable and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>