<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1549 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312104</link>
    <description>At the discharge stage under Section 227 CrPC in a Prevention of Corruption Act prosecution, the court must sift the prosecution material, assess broad probabilities, and determine whether it discloses grave suspicion or only a weak suspicion. It cannot conduct a full trial-like evaluation, but it must exclude unsupported or internally inconsistent material before deciding whether the accused must stand trial. On the record, inflated expenditure based on an incorrect bank balance, a loan repayment already reflected in salary deductions, and seized articles unconnected to the relevant check period did not establish a prima facie case. Discharge was therefore warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:26:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1549 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312104</link>
      <description>At the discharge stage under Section 227 CrPC in a Prevention of Corruption Act prosecution, the court must sift the prosecution material, assess broad probabilities, and determine whether it discloses grave suspicion or only a weak suspicion. It cannot conduct a full trial-like evaluation, but it must exclude unsupported or internally inconsistent material before deciding whether the accused must stand trial. On the record, inflated expenditure based on an incorrect bank balance, a loan repayment already reflected in salary deductions, and seized articles unconnected to the relevant check period did not establish a prima facie case. Discharge was therefore warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>