<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1403 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312103</link>
    <description>The SC held that AYUSH doctors are entitled to the same enhanced superannuation age of 65 years as allopathic doctors under CHS, finding no rational justification for differential treatment since both categories render service to patients. The court ordered retrospective application of the AYUSH Ministry order from 31.05.2016, directing payment of full salary arrears within 8 weeks with 6% interest for delayed payment beyond the stipulated period. The appeal was disposed of with all consequences following from this conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:26:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1403 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312103</link>
      <description>The SC held that AYUSH doctors are entitled to the same enhanced superannuation age of 65 years as allopathic doctors under CHS, finding no rational justification for differential treatment since both categories render service to patients. The court ordered retrospective application of the AYUSH Ministry order from 31.05.2016, directing payment of full salary arrears within 8 weeks with 6% interest for delayed payment beyond the stipulated period. The appeal was disposed of with all consequences following from this conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>