https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312101 The HC upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque to the complainant. The accused failed to repay a loan, leading to the cheque's dishonor and subsequent legal action. Despite disputing the amount borrowed and repaid, the accused could not substantiate their defense, and the courts favored the complainant's evidence, including ATM withdrawals and the dishonored cheque. The HC found no error in the lower courts' decisions, dismissing the revision and affirming the accused's conviction based on legal presumptions supporting the complainant. en-us Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:26:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312101 The HC upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque to the complainant. The accused failed to repay a loan, leading to the cheque's dishonor and subsequent legal action. Despite disputing the amount borrowed and repaid, the accused could not substantiate their defense, and the courts favored the complainant's evidence, including ATM withdrawals and the dishonored cheque. The HC found no error in the lower courts' decisions, dismissing the revision and affirming the accused's conviction based on legal presumptions supporting the complainant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312101