<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1986 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312100</link>
    <description>A director&#039;s criminal liability for cheque dishonour is not automatic. In prosecutions under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the complaint must contain clear and specific averments that the accused was in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business at the relevant time, together with particulars showing how that responsibility arose. Mere repetition of the statutory language is insufficient, especially for non-executive or nominee directors. As the complaint failed to satisfy these requirements, the criminal proceedings were quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:26:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1986 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312100</link>
      <description>A director&#039;s criminal liability for cheque dishonour is not automatic. In prosecutions under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the complaint must contain clear and specific averments that the accused was in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business at the relevant time, together with particulars showing how that responsibility arose. Mere repetition of the statutory language is insufficient, especially for non-executive or nominee directors. As the complaint failed to satisfy these requirements, the criminal proceedings were quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>