https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312099 The HC struck down clause 1(2) of Government Order dated 30.9.2012 as arbitrary for prospectively applying retirement age enhancement from 58 to 60 years. The court held that denying retrospective benefits to employees who retired before 30.9.2012 was unreasonable, especially when the board resolution was received three years earlier. The Government Order was ordered to apply retrospectively from the original resolution date (29.6.2002). Petitioners were deemed to have worked until age 60, entitled to salary arrears and recalculated retirement benefits. Writ petition allowed. en-us Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:26:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312099 The HC struck down clause 1(2) of Government Order dated 30.9.2012 as arbitrary for prospectively applying retirement age enhancement from 58 to 60 years. The court held that denying retrospective benefits to employees who retired before 30.9.2012 was unreasonable, especially when the board resolution was received three years earlier. The Government Order was ordered to apply retrospectively from the original resolution date (29.6.2002). Petitioners were deemed to have worked until age 60, entitled to salary arrears and recalculated retirement benefits. Writ petition allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312099