https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312098 The Gujarat HC dismissed a revision application in a dishonoured cheque case. The accused issued a cheque that was returned for insufficient funds. Despite receiving statutory notice via RPAD, the accused failed to respond or provide adequate defense. The HC found the accused's documentary evidence insufficient to rebut the statutory presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act. With no evidence of cheque misuse or loss, and concurrent findings from two lower courts confirming conviction, the HC upheld the conviction, noting that revisional jurisdiction does not permit re-appreciation of evidence when lower courts have made concurrent factual findings. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:26:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312098 The Gujarat HC dismissed a revision application in a dishonoured cheque case. The accused issued a cheque that was returned for insufficient funds. Despite receiving statutory notice via RPAD, the accused failed to respond or provide adequate defense. The HC found the accused's documentary evidence insufficient to rebut the statutory presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act. With no evidence of cheque misuse or loss, and concurrent findings from two lower courts confirming conviction, the HC upheld the conviction, noting that revisional jurisdiction does not permit re-appreciation of evidence when lower courts have made concurrent factual findings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312098