<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 832 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312092</link>
    <description>SC set aside HC interim orders dated 12 September 2018 and 23 January 2020 regarding enhancement of superannuation age for medical officers to sixty-five years. HC had directed salary payment to respondent during interim stage despite tribunal&#039;s rejection of her claim. SC held HC was unjustified in granting final relief at interim stage when tribunal&#039;s correctness remained undetermined. Appeal allowed, interim orders set aside for virtually amounting to final relief grant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:08:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 832 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312092</link>
      <description>SC set aside HC interim orders dated 12 September 2018 and 23 January 2020 regarding enhancement of superannuation age for medical officers to sixty-five years. HC had directed salary payment to respondent during interim stage despite tribunal&#039;s rejection of her claim. SC held HC was unjustified in granting final relief at interim stage when tribunal&#039;s correctness remained undetermined. Appeal allowed, interim orders set aside for virtually amounting to final relief grant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>