https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312086 An appellate court may reappreciate evidence in an appeal against acquittal, but interference is warranted only when the trial court's view is not a reasonably possible view and reversal is needed to prevent miscarriage of justice; on the stated facts, the High Court's reversal was upheld. Conviction with the aid of common intention is not vitiated merely because Section 34 was not expressly charged unless the accused shows real prejudice or failure of justice; none was shown. The evidence of prior confrontation, waiting for the deceased, concealed weapons, and a lethal attack on a vital part established preconcert and a shared intent to kill. en-us Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:44:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312086 An appellate court may reappreciate evidence in an appeal against acquittal, but interference is warranted only when the trial court's view is not a reasonably possible view and reversal is needed to prevent miscarriage of justice; on the stated facts, the High Court's reversal was upheld. Conviction with the aid of common intention is not vitiated merely because Section 34 was not expressly charged unless the accused shows real prejudice or failure of justice; none was shown. The evidence of prior confrontation, waiting for the deceased, concealed weapons, and a lethal attack on a vital part established preconcert and a shared intent to kill. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312086