https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312084 Quo warranto is confined to testing whether a public office exists and whether the incumbent lacks statutory authority or eligibility under the governing scheme. Where an interim arrangement is expressly authorised to run the utility and permit one person to discharge the functions of Chairman and CEO, a temporary charge under that scheme is not invalid merely because the person was not selected as a regular CEO. Internal administration and service regulations outside the scheme do not expand quo warranto review, and remuneration for services actually rendered under a valid interim arrangement is not ordinarily recoverable. On that basis, the impugned writ interference and recovery direction were held unsustainable, and the Commission's arrangement was upheld. en-us Fri, 01 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:30:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312084 Quo warranto is confined to testing whether a public office exists and whether the incumbent lacks statutory authority or eligibility under the governing scheme. Where an interim arrangement is expressly authorised to run the utility and permit one person to discharge the functions of Chairman and CEO, a temporary charge under that scheme is not invalid merely because the person was not selected as a regular CEO. Internal administration and service regulations outside the scheme do not expand quo warranto review, and remuneration for services actually rendered under a valid interim arrangement is not ordinarily recoverable. On that basis, the impugned writ interference and recovery direction were held unsustainable, and the Commission's arrangement was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312084