<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 614 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312083</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the impugned HC judgments regarding the entitlement of daily wagers to minimum wages equivalent to regular Class IV employees. The cases were remitted back to the HC for a detailed examination of each case, focusing on factors such as the nature of work, qualifications, and recruitment processes. The HC was instructed to ensure that all necessary averments and proofs are provided before issuing directions for equal pay. Additionally, for cases involving contract workers, amendments to petitions were allowed to clarify claims of regular appointments. The appeals were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:50:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 614 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312083</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the impugned HC judgments regarding the entitlement of daily wagers to minimum wages equivalent to regular Class IV employees. The cases were remitted back to the HC for a detailed examination of each case, focusing on factors such as the nature of work, qualifications, and recruitment processes. The HC was instructed to ensure that all necessary averments and proofs are provided before issuing directions for equal pay. Additionally, for cases involving contract workers, amendments to petitions were allowed to clarify claims of regular appointments. The appeals were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>