https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312082 The court determined that proceedings by educational institutions to impose penalties for malpractice are quasi-judicial, necessitating adherence to principles of natural justice. It emphasized that examinees must be informed of accusations and given a reasonable opportunity to defend themselves. The court found that the petitioner was adequately informed and allowed to present her case, with her explanation considered by the Disciplinary Sub-Committee. Concluding there was no breach of natural justice principles, the court dismissed the writ application. Judges Ranganath Misra and Bijay Kishore Ray concurred with the judgment by Chief Justice G.K. Mishra. en-us Mon, 06 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:17:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312082 The court determined that proceedings by educational institutions to impose penalties for malpractice are quasi-judicial, necessitating adherence to principles of natural justice. It emphasized that examinees must be informed of accusations and given a reasonable opportunity to defend themselves. The court found that the petitioner was adequately informed and allowed to present her case, with her explanation considered by the Disciplinary Sub-Committee. Concluding there was no breach of natural justice principles, the court dismissed the writ application. Judges Ranganath Misra and Bijay Kishore Ray concurred with the judgment by Chief Justice G.K. Mishra. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312082