<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1245 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448846</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax penalty for e-Way Bill Part &#039;B&#039; non-filing. Court found technical error without tax evasion intent does not warrant penalty. Quashed penalty orders and directed return of security to petitioner within six weeks, following precedent of similar cases involving procedural non-compliance without fraudulent intent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1245 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448846</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax penalty for e-Way Bill Part &#039;B&#039; non-filing. Court found technical error without tax evasion intent does not warrant penalty. Quashed penalty orders and directed return of security to petitioner within six weeks, following precedent of similar cases involving procedural non-compliance without fraudulent intent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>