<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1244 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448845</link>
    <description>The writ petition was entertained because the second appellate tribunal had not yet been constituted, and the petitioner indicated an intention to pursue the statutory remedy once available. Pending the writ, the Court granted interim protection against the balance tax demand, but only on condition that the entire tax demand was deposited within the stipulated time. Notice was issued, the writ petition was kept pending, and the interlocutory application was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1244 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448845</link>
      <description>The writ petition was entertained because the second appellate tribunal had not yet been constituted, and the petitioner indicated an intention to pursue the statutory remedy once available. Pending the writ, the Court granted interim protection against the balance tax demand, but only on condition that the entire tax demand was deposited within the stipulated time. Notice was issued, the writ petition was kept pending, and the interlocutory application was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>