<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1229 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448830</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC dismissed an appeal concerning assessment under Section 153A and disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii). The court held that regular items shown in books of accounts cannot be added to taxable income unless incriminating material is found during search proceedings under Section 132(1). Following precedent from Saumya Constructions Limited and Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd., the court ruled that without incriminating material discovered during search, the AO cannot make additions for completed/unabated assessments. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that no contrary evidence was presented against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was upheld. No substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1229 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448830</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC dismissed an appeal concerning assessment under Section 153A and disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii). The court held that regular items shown in books of accounts cannot be added to taxable income unless incriminating material is found during search proceedings under Section 132(1). Following precedent from Saumya Constructions Limited and Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd., the court ruled that without incriminating material discovered during search, the AO cannot make additions for completed/unabated assessments. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that no contrary evidence was presented against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was upheld. No substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>