https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35639 The court held that the reunion of Paramanand L. Bajaj and his three sons was valid despite the sons not bringing their partitioned properties back into the family hotchpot. The court also held that the reunion did not require a registered deed as the original partition was oral. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the validity of the reunion under the given circumstances. en-us Mon, 13 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:56:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35639 The court held that the reunion of Paramanand L. Bajaj and his three sons was valid despite the sons not bringing their partitioned properties back into the family hotchpot. The court also held that the reunion did not require a registered deed as the original partition was oral. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the validity of the reunion under the given circumstances. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 13 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35639