<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reopening of Tax Assessment Deemed Invalid Due to Incorrect Assumptions About Property Sale Involving Partnership Firms.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74506</link>
    <description>Validity of reopening u/s 147 r.w.s. 148 - The Tribunal found that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer (AO) for reopening the assessment under section 147/148 were based on incorrect assumptions and information. Specifically, the AO erroneously believed that the assessee, an individual, had entered into a transaction of sale of immovable property, whereas the transaction was actually between two partnership firms. - The Tribunal noted that the AO should have issued a notice to the partnership firm involved instead of the individual assessee. - Consequently, entire proceedings u/s. 148 is held to be invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:26:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:26:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reopening of Tax Assessment Deemed Invalid Due to Incorrect Assumptions About Property Sale Involving Partnership Firms.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74506</link>
      <description>Validity of reopening u/s 147 r.w.s. 148 - The Tribunal found that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer (AO) for reopening the assessment under section 147/148 were based on incorrect assumptions and information. Specifically, the AO erroneously believed that the assessee, an individual, had entered into a transaction of sale of immovable property, whereas the transaction was actually between two partnership firms. - The Tribunal noted that the AO should have issued a notice to the partnership firm involved instead of the individual assessee. - Consequently, entire proceedings u/s. 148 is held to be invalid.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:26:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>