<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 61 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35637</link>
    <description>The court&#039;s power to test probate valuation was not displaced by the Court-Fees Act procedure for Collector&#039;s objections. Once a caveat is filed, probate proceedings are treated as a suit, so civil procedure principles permit the court to require correction of an undervalued petition. The valuation shown in estate duty proceedings was not treated as a separate figure because the estate duty law required the same account for representation proceedings and allowed inquiry into principal value. As the petitioner accepted that assessment and did not challenge it in appeal, the court could adopt the estate duty valuation for probate and direct amendment of the petition with payment of the deficit court-fee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:51:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 61 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35637</link>
      <description>The court&#039;s power to test probate valuation was not displaced by the Court-Fees Act procedure for Collector&#039;s objections. Once a caveat is filed, probate proceedings are treated as a suit, so civil procedure principles permit the court to require correction of an undervalued petition. The valuation shown in estate duty proceedings was not treated as a separate figure because the estate duty law required the same account for representation proceedings and allowed inquiry into principal value. As the petitioner accepted that assessment and did not challenge it in appeal, the court could adopt the estate duty valuation for probate and direct amendment of the petition with payment of the deficit court-fee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>