<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1211 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448812</link>
    <description>The CESTAT NEW DELHI held that soap stock arising during groundnut refined oil manufacture from April 2006 to February 2015 qualifies for exemption under Notification No. 89/95 CE. Following the Larger Bench decision in Ricela Health Foods Ltd., the tribunal ruled that fatty acids, waxes, and gum produced during vegetable oil refining constitute waste rather than manufactured excisable goods. The court emphasized that commercial value cannot determine whether a product is manufactured goods or waste. Relying on Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. SC precedent, removal of unwanted materials during refining does not constitute manufacturing. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:25:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1211 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448812</link>
      <description>The CESTAT NEW DELHI held that soap stock arising during groundnut refined oil manufacture from April 2006 to February 2015 qualifies for exemption under Notification No. 89/95 CE. Following the Larger Bench decision in Ricela Health Foods Ltd., the tribunal ruled that fatty acids, waxes, and gum produced during vegetable oil refining constitute waste rather than manufactured excisable goods. The court emphasized that commercial value cannot determine whether a product is manufactured goods or waste. Relying on Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. SC precedent, removal of unwanted materials during refining does not constitute manufacturing. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>