https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312080 A writ petition challenging alleged technical glitches under an expired SPLDRS scheme was not entertained, as the Court treated the competent administrative authority as the proper forum once the scheme had lapsed. The HC declined to examine the petitioner's factual allegations on merits and granted no substantive relief in writ jurisdiction. However, it directed the authority concerned to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation in accordance with law within a reasonable time, preferably within eight weeks of communication of the order. en-us Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2024 21:18:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312080 A writ petition challenging alleged technical glitches under an expired SPLDRS scheme was not entertained, as the Court treated the competent administrative authority as the proper forum once the scheme had lapsed. The HC declined to examine the petitioner's factual allegations on merits and granted no substantive relief in writ jurisdiction. However, it directed the authority concerned to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation in accordance with law within a reasonable time, preferably within eight weeks of communication of the order. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312080