https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312055 Teachers of three State engineering colleges could not claim parity in superannuation age with teachers of Bihar College of Engineering, Patna, because the two groups were governed by different recruitment processes, service rules and statutory regimes. The State college teachers were government servants under the Bihar Service Code, while the university teachers were recruited through the University Service Commission and governed by the Patna University Act. Article 14 did not compel equal retirement age where a rational basis existed for the distinction. The claim for parity, and the related demands for arrears and benefits, was rejected; the High Court's contrary direction was set aside. en-us Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:34:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312055 Teachers of three State engineering colleges could not claim parity in superannuation age with teachers of Bihar College of Engineering, Patna, because the two groups were governed by different recruitment processes, service rules and statutory regimes. The State college teachers were government servants under the Bihar Service Code, while the university teachers were recruited through the University Service Commission and governed by the Patna University Act. Article 14 did not compel equal retirement age where a rational basis existed for the distinction. The claim for parity, and the related demands for arrears and benefits, was rejected; the High Court's contrary direction was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312055