<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 30 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35631</link>
    <description>The court held that the notice under section 148 to reopen the assessment was invalid as it was solely due to a change of opinion by the new assessing officer. The court emphasized that all relevant documents were already scrutinized by the previous assessing officer before passing the assessment order, and any discrepancies should have been noticed then. Consequently, the court quashed the notice under section 148, directing the respondent to cease further proceedings against the petitioner and bear the legal costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:38:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 30 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35631</link>
      <description>The court held that the notice under section 148 to reopen the assessment was invalid as it was solely due to a change of opinion by the new assessing officer. The court emphasized that all relevant documents were already scrutinized by the previous assessing officer before passing the assessment order, and any discrepancies should have been noticed then. Consequently, the court quashed the notice under section 148, directing the respondent to cease further proceedings against the petitioner and bear the legal costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>