https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312049 Compensation for acquired land could not be reduced merely because the acquisition was treated as a large block or because the exemplar land was at a slightly different distance. The earlier exemplar award had attained finality, and the lands were found similar in nature and potentiality; no material inferiority in the acquired land was proved. On that basis, the High Court's 25% deduction was unsustainable, the reduction was set aside, and the compensation fixed by the Reference Court was restored. en-us Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:09:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312049 Compensation for acquired land could not be reduced merely because the acquisition was treated as a large block or because the exemplar land was at a slightly different distance. The earlier exemplar award had attained finality, and the lands were found similar in nature and potentiality; no material inferiority in the acquired land was proved. On that basis, the High Court's 25% deduction was unsustainable, the reduction was set aside, and the compensation fixed by the Reference Court was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312049