<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 1000 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312047</link>
    <description>Land acquisition compensation must reflect the real market value on the notification date, assessed by comparable sales, surrounding development, location, and potentiality. Where earlier base rates are carried forward, 12% annual escalation may be applied on a cumulative basis if appropriate. A rigid belting system was disapproved for lands that had already lost their purely agricultural character, and a flat 40% development deduction was held excessive; one-third deduction was treated as the fair norm on these facts. The connected matters were then reassessed group-wise, with revised compensation rates applied to the different clusters and excessive deductions reduced accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:00:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 1000 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312047</link>
      <description>Land acquisition compensation must reflect the real market value on the notification date, assessed by comparable sales, surrounding development, location, and potentiality. Where earlier base rates are carried forward, 12% annual escalation may be applied on a cumulative basis if appropriate. A rigid belting system was disapproved for lands that had already lost their purely agricultural character, and a flat 40% development deduction was held excessive; one-third deduction was treated as the fair norm on these facts. The connected matters were then reassessed group-wise, with revised compensation rates applied to the different clusters and excessive deductions reduced accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>