<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court dismisses Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholds no penalty for assessee&#039;s subsidy treatment as capital receipt.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74491</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty - debatable issue - As per AO assessee treated the revenue receipt of subsidy as capital receipt - As per High Court no error in the findings recorded by Tribunal while setting aside penalty - With the Supreme Court dismissing the Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by the Revenue against the order, the decision of the lower courts stands affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:52:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:52:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court dismisses Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholds no penalty for assessee&#039;s subsidy treatment as capital receipt.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74491</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty - debatable issue - As per AO assessee treated the revenue receipt of subsidy as capital receipt - As per High Court no error in the findings recorded by Tribunal while setting aside penalty - With the Supreme Court dismissing the Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by the Revenue against the order, the decision of the lower courts stands affirmed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:52:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>