https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312046 Employees of an autonomous research council were governed by the council's bye-laws, and the specific retirement clause fixing superannuation at 60 years prevailed over general service rules applied only mutatis mutandis. The enhancement of retirement age for AYUSH doctors under the Ministry did not automatically extend to autonomous-body employees with a distinct service regime. Similarity in duties, including patient treatment, could not displace the governing bye-laws or create parity with government doctors. The High Court erred in granting relief on functional similarity rather than the applicable service framework, and the claim for enhancement of superannuation age was rejected. en-us Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312046 Employees of an autonomous research council were governed by the council's bye-laws, and the specific retirement clause fixing superannuation at 60 years prevailed over general service rules applied only mutatis mutandis. The enhancement of retirement age for AYUSH doctors under the Ministry did not automatically extend to autonomous-body employees with a distinct service regime. Similarity in duties, including patient treatment, could not displace the governing bye-laws or create parity with government doctors. The High Court erred in granting relief on functional similarity rather than the applicable service framework, and the claim for enhancement of superannuation age was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312046