<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 1074 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312044</link>
    <description>For territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2), only material and integral facts forming the basis of the grievance constitute the cause of action. Mere service of an order within the forum State may make the order effective and give rise to a right of action, but it does not by itself create territorial jurisdiction. In service matters, once an appellate authority passes an order, the original order merges in the appellate order, so the relevant cause of action arises from the making of the appellate order, not from its receipt. The contrary view treating service as part of the cause of action was stated to be inconsistent with settled law and was overruled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 06:30:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 1074 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312044</link>
      <description>For territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2), only material and integral facts forming the basis of the grievance constitute the cause of action. Mere service of an order within the forum State may make the order effective and give rise to a right of action, but it does not by itself create territorial jurisdiction. In service matters, once an appellate authority passes an order, the original order merges in the appellate order, so the relevant cause of action arises from the making of the appellate order, not from its receipt. The contrary view treating service as part of the cause of action was stated to be inconsistent with settled law and was overruled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>