https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448750 HC examined a GST Act case concerning appeal time extension and penalty provisions. The court acknowledged the petitioner's arguments about discriminatory notification but declined to issue a mandamus. Instead, the HC directed the Central Board of Indirect Taxes to review and consider including Sections 129 and 130 in the notification, effectively providing guidance without a binding directive. The case was adjourned indefinitely. en-us Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Apr 2025 15:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448750 HC examined a GST Act case concerning appeal time extension and penalty provisions. The court acknowledged the petitioner's arguments about discriminatory notification but declined to issue a mandamus. Instead, the HC directed the Central Board of Indirect Taxes to review and consider including Sections 129 and 130 in the notification, effectively providing guidance without a binding directive. The case was adjourned indefinitely. Case-Laws GST Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448750