<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1141 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448742</link>
    <description>The SC examined a GST registration cancellation case, focusing on retrospective cancellation and procedural fairness. The court modified the cancellation date to align with the petitioner&#039;s last business operation, emphasizing that retrospective cancellation requires objective criteria and opportunity for the taxpayer to respond. The judgment directed the petitioner to file pending returns and allowed tax authorities to pursue outstanding liabilities within legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1141 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448742</link>
      <description>The SC examined a GST registration cancellation case, focusing on retrospective cancellation and procedural fairness. The court modified the cancellation date to align with the petitioner&#039;s last business operation, emphasizing that retrospective cancellation requires objective criteria and opportunity for the taxpayer to respond. The judgment directed the petitioner to file pending returns and allowed tax authorities to pursue outstanding liabilities within legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>