<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1116 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448717</link>
    <description>CESTAT addressed a CENVAT credit dispute involving alleged fraudulent activities. Despite Revenue&#039;s objections about a pending case against another party, the Tribunal found insufficient grounds to delay proceedings. Examining manufacturing evidence, the Tribunal determined the lack of definitive proof of fraudulent activities and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the original order denying CENVAT credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 16:26:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1116 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448717</link>
      <description>CESTAT addressed a CENVAT credit dispute involving alleged fraudulent activities. Despite Revenue&#039;s objections about a pending case against another party, the Tribunal found insufficient grounds to delay proceedings. Examining manufacturing evidence, the Tribunal determined the lack of definitive proof of fraudulent activities and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the original order denying CENVAT credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>