https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312025 The SC issued a notice in the case regarding the interpretation of "consideration" under Section 2(31) of the Goods Service Tax Act 2017 and the inclusion of bi-products like broken rice, bran, and husk in the consideration under an agreement with a rice miller. The SC questioned the HC's jurisdiction in entertaining a petition under Article 226 without exhausting appeal remedies. The SC granted a stay on coercive actions against the petitioners based on the HC's judgment and directed respondents to file a counter affidavit within three weeks. The matter is returnable in eight weeks. en-us Mon, 15 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312025 The SC issued a notice in the case regarding the interpretation of "consideration" under Section 2(31) of the Goods Service Tax Act 2017 and the inclusion of bi-products like broken rice, bran, and husk in the consideration under an agreement with a rice miller. The SC questioned the HC's jurisdiction in entertaining a petition under Article 226 without exhausting appeal remedies. The SC granted a stay on coercive actions against the petitioners based on the HC's judgment and directed respondents to file a counter affidavit within three weeks. The matter is returnable in eight weeks. Case-Laws GST Mon, 15 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312025