<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1442 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312021</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 4,08,06,000/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, related to non-genuine/unexplained share capital/share premium. The CIT (A) had reversed the addition, accepting the assessee&#039;s valuation report under the DCF method as per Rule 11UA for Section 56(2)(viib). The Tribunal upheld this decision, noting that the valuation was consistent and the source of funds was undisputed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2024 10:39:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1442 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312021</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 4,08,06,000/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, related to non-genuine/unexplained share capital/share premium. The CIT (A) had reversed the addition, accepting the assessee&#039;s valuation report under the DCF method as per Rule 11UA for Section 56(2)(viib). The Tribunal upheld this decision, noting that the valuation was consistent and the source of funds was undisputed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>