<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 329 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312017</link>
    <description>HC upheld salary reduction for unqualified Pharmacists based on Third Pay Commission recommendations. Despite previous higher pay, the Court ruled that different pay scales based on qualifications are valid. The principle of &#039;equal pay for equal work&#039; was not applicable due to distinct professional categories. Petitions were partially allowed, with no recovery of previously paid excess amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 329 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312017</link>
      <description>HC upheld salary reduction for unqualified Pharmacists based on Third Pay Commission recommendations. Despite previous higher pay, the Court ruled that different pay scales based on qualifications are valid. The principle of &#039;equal pay for equal work&#039; was not applicable due to distinct professional categories. Petitions were partially allowed, with no recovery of previously paid excess amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>