https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312015 The Allahabad HC dismissed the writ petition concerning the award of a catering contract at a railway station, determining it lacked territorial jurisdiction under Article 226. The petitioner challenged the contract awarded to the third respondent, arguing non-compliance with experience criteria. The court found that the cause of action arose in Jabalpur, outside its jurisdiction. It emphasized that the location of the contract's performance was not integral to the cause of action. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies in an appropriate jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jan 2024 13:38:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312015 The Allahabad HC dismissed the writ petition concerning the award of a catering contract at a railway station, determining it lacked territorial jurisdiction under Article 226. The petitioner challenged the contract awarded to the third respondent, arguing non-compliance with experience criteria. The court found that the cause of action arose in Jabalpur, outside its jurisdiction. It emphasized that the location of the contract's performance was not integral to the cause of action. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies in an appropriate jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312015