https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312013 Order 2 Rule 2 CPC bars a later suit only when it is founded on the same cause of action as an earlier suit and an omitted relief could have been claimed then without leave. Order 2 Rule 4 CPC governs joinder of claims in suits for recovery of immovable property, but it does not create a universal rule that ejectment and mesne profits or arrears of rent always arise from distinct causes of action. In a landlord-tenant dispute based on a lease, the tenancy determination and the tenant's failure to vacate may provide a common factual foundation for both reliefs. Where leave was obtained to sue later, the subsequent ejectment suit was maintainable. en-us Tue, 30 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jan 2024 14:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312013 Order 2 Rule 2 CPC bars a later suit only when it is founded on the same cause of action as an earlier suit and an omitted relief could have been claimed then without leave. Order 2 Rule 4 CPC governs joinder of claims in suits for recovery of immovable property, but it does not create a universal rule that ejectment and mesne profits or arrears of rent always arise from distinct causes of action. In a landlord-tenant dispute based on a lease, the tenancy determination and the tenant's failure to vacate may provide a common factual foundation for both reliefs. Where leave was obtained to sue later, the subsequent ejectment suit was maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312013