https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312011 The Calcutta HC determined that the writ application was not maintainable within its jurisdiction, as the cause of action did not arise within its territorial limits. The court found that the circulars regarding excise duty exemption were issued by authorities outside its jurisdiction, and thus, the entire cause of action did not occur within its domain. Consequently, the interim order was vacated, the Rule was discharged, and the application for contempt was disposed of. A related case was resolved similarly, and the court ordered the return of the Bank guarantee provided by the petitioner. en-us Fri, 04 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jan 2024 13:17:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312011 The Calcutta HC determined that the writ application was not maintainable within its jurisdiction, as the cause of action did not arise within its territorial limits. The court found that the circulars regarding excise duty exemption were issued by authorities outside its jurisdiction, and thus, the entire cause of action did not occur within its domain. Consequently, the interim order was vacated, the Rule was discharged, and the application for contempt was disposed of. A related case was resolved similarly, and the court ordered the return of the Bank guarantee provided by the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312011