<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (7) TMI 272 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312006</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the orders rejecting the nomination papers, declaring them valid, and directed the Institute to include the petitioners&#039; names in the list of valid nominations. The court emphasized that this decision was in the interest of all parties, preventing potential re-elections and saving time and resources. The rule was made absolute, with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 11:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (7) TMI 272 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312006</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the orders rejecting the nomination papers, declaring them valid, and directed the Institute to include the petitioners&#039; names in the list of valid nominations. The court emphasized that this decision was in the interest of all parties, preventing potential re-elections and saving time and resources. The rule was made absolute, with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>