https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312006 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 existed where part of the cause of action arose within the Court's limits, including receipt of the impugned rejection orders at Bangalore after the nomination papers were sent from there. Rejection of the nomination papers was invalid because the governing election regulation permitted rejection only for defects of substantial character, not mere technical omissions. Read as a whole, the forms clearly identified the intended constituency, regional form, fee, and electoral destination, so the imperfect description of "India" or "region" did not create real ambiguity. The rejection orders were therefore quashed and the nominations treated as valid. en-us Mon, 05 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jan 2024 11:51:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312006 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 existed where part of the cause of action arose within the Court's limits, including receipt of the impugned rejection orders at Bangalore after the nomination papers were sent from there. Rejection of the nomination papers was invalid because the governing election regulation permitted rejection only for defects of substantial character, not mere technical omissions. Read as a whole, the forms clearly identified the intended constituency, regional form, fee, and electoral destination, so the imperfect description of "India" or "region" did not create real ambiguity. The rejection orders were therefore quashed and the nominations treated as valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312006